The <dl>, or description list, element is underrated.

It’s used to represent a list of name–value pairs. This is a common UI pattern that, at the same time, is incredibly versatile.

The Anatomy of a Description List

I’ve been saying <dl>, when really, I’m talking about three separate elements: <dl>, <dt>, and <dd>.

We start with our <dl>. This is the description list, akin to using a <ul> for an unordered list or an <ol> for an ordered list.

<dl>
</dl>

Fancy.

Next up, we want to add a name–value pair. We’ll use a <dt>, short for description term, for the name, and we’ll use a <dd>, short for description detail, for the value.

<dl>
  <dt>Title</dt>
  <dd>Designing with Web Standards</dd>
</dl>

To add another name–value pair to our list, we add another <dt> and <dd>:

<dl>
  <dt>Title</dt>
  <dd>Designing with Web Standards</dd>
  <dt>Publisher</dt>
  <dd>New Riders Pub; 3rd edition (October 19, 2009)</dd>
</dl>

But wait – what if I have a term that has multiple values? For instance, what if this book has multiple authors?

That’s fine! One <dt> can have multiple <dd>s:

<dl>
  <dt>Title</dt>
  <dd>Designing with Web Standards</dd>
  <dt>Author</dt>
  <dd>Jeffrey Zeldman</dd>
  <dd>Ethan Marcotte</dd>
  <dt>Publisher</dt>
  <dd>New Riders Pub; 3rd edition (October 19, 2009)</dd>
</dl>

There’s one last piece of the description list anatomy to look at for most basic use cases: what if I want to wrap a <dt> and its <dd>(s) for styling reasons?

In this case, the specs allow you to wrap a <dt> and its <dd>(s) in a <div>:

<dl>
  <div>
    <dt>Title</dt>
    <dd>Designing with Web Standards</dd>
  </div>
  <div>
    <dt>Author</dt>
    <dd>Jeffrey Zeldman</dd>
    <dd>Ethan Marcotte</dd>
  </div>
  <div>
    <dt>Publisher</dt>
    <dd>New Riders Pub; 3rd edition (October 19, 2009)</dd>
  </div>
</dl>

A wrapper <div> like this is the only element that can wrap those <dt>/<dd> groups.

And that’s it! That’s the anatomy of the description list, HTML’s semantic way to mark up a list of name–value groups!

Why Do We Need Semantics For This Anyways?

Before we learned about the <dl>, <dt>, and <dd> elements, we used to use nested <div>s for this pattern all the time. It looked a lot like:

<div class="book-details">
  <div class="book-details--item">
    <div class="book-details--label">
      Title
    </div>
    <div class="book-details--value">
      Designing with Web Standards
    </div>
  </div>
  <div class="book-details--item">
    <div class="book-details--label">
      Author
    </div>
    <div class="book-details--value">
      Jeffrey Zeldman
    </div>
    <div class="book-details--value">
      Ethan Marcotte
    </div>
  </div>
  <div class="book-details--item">
    <div class="book-details--label">
      Publisher
    </div>
    <div class="book-details--value">
      New Riders Pub; 3rd edition (October 19, 2009)
    </div>
  </div>
</div>

This has all the information about the book, right? Why do we need semantics for a list of name–value groups in the first place if something like a series of nested <div>s could get the job done?

When determining whether a semantic element might be appropriate for a given pattern, I find it helpful to ask, “What benefits – even theoretical – could we get if computers could recognize this pattern?” In this case, what lift could we get if browsers could somehow recognize a list of name–value groups?

Answers to that question will be varied. I tend to spend a lot of time advocating for web accessibility, so my first thought tends to be how screenreaders could interpret the pattern. Off the top of my head, I can think of a couple of benefits screenreader users could get from their screenreaders recognizing this pattern:

1. The screenreader could tell the user how many name–value groups are in the list.
2. The screenreader could tell the user how far into the list they are.
3. The screenreader could treat the list as one block that the user could skip over if they’re uninterested in it.

All of these could make the list more usable than a series of nested <div>s, which would treat each name and value in the list as nothing more than a standalone text node.

If you can come up with a couple of even theoretical lifts from the user’s device recognizing a pattern, then there’s a good chance that the pattern is a strong candidate for having some associated semantics.

For what it’s worth, these screenreader experiences aren’t hypothetical – they’re benefits that screenreader users really get from using <dl> in most browser/screenreader combinations. Admittedly, however, support for the <dl> element is not yet universal. You may decide that screenreaders’ fallback experience – treating the list as standalone text nodes – isn’t sufficient for your use case, and instead opt for something like a <ul> until support improves.

Takeaways

Lists of name–value pairs (or, in some cases, name–value groups) are a common pattern across the web, in part due to their versatility. HTML lets us mark up these lists with a combination of three elements:

• The <dl>, or description list, element, which wraps the entire list of name–value pairs
• The <dt>, or description term, element, which represents a name in our name–value pairs
• The <dd>, or description detail, element, which represents a value in our name–value pairs

Ascribing semantics to patterns such as these gives our users’ devices the information they need to curate useful, usable experiences – oftentimes in ways that we as developers may not expect.

To learn more about description lists and what’s allowed or not allowed, I recommend the MDN docs on the <dl>, or going directly to the specs!

Source: benmyers.dev – Author: Ben Myers